Tag Archive for: Linda Rodriguez

Of Tempests in Teapots, Po-Biz, and a Welcome Return to Sanity

by Linda Rodriguez

I’m a hyphenate writer. Poet-mystery novelist. One foot
stands in the airy-fairy literary world of poetry, where I’ve published two
books, many individual poems, and won some national awards, while the other is
planted firmly in the down-to-earth storytelling of mysteries and thrillers
where all the loose ends have to be tied up or explained and where I’ve been
very fortunate also. Although I love both worlds and have wonderful friends in
both, as well as people who have mentored and helped me, I’ve come to realize
there’s a real difference—and this past week brought that home with a sting.
The poetry world—or “po-biz” as we poets tend to refer to it
to mark the difference between writing the poems and building the career by
publishing, winning awards, getting tenure, booking readings, etc.—is very
competitive. At least, the establishment academic poetry world is highly competitive.
The side niches where you will find most of the African American, Asian
American, Latino, or Native American poets are highly cooperative and
collaborative, real communities, and their members usually don’t get the plum
positions or lucrative honors.
The world of mysteries, where there is more money and a vastly
larger number of readers at stake, is surprisingly not cutthroat competitive,
but much more of a cooperative and collaborative community, even though it
would be considered by the po-biz folks to be pretty establishment. From the
beginning, I was blown away by how generous and helpful major writers were
toward the beginner I was, and as I’ve spent more and more time among the mystery
writers, I’ve seen firsthand how super-collaborative they all are.
I still write and publish poetry. In fact, I have another
full-length book manuscript I’ll be sending out for publication in the near
future—to join my other two published collections, I hope. I negotiate the two
worlds with a shake of my head at the differences, and that’s about all. Until
something like last week happens that really brings home to me the absolute difference
in cultures.
I was thrilled to learn that a dear friend and fellow poet, Richard
Blanco, had been selected as the inaugural poet for President Obama’s second
inauguration. I’ve studied and critiqued manuscripts with Richard, and I know
what a gifted poet he is. He has won some of the po-biz’s major awards,
equivalent to the Edgar or Rita, and continues to study and work hard to
constantly challenge himself and improve his art. Plus he’s a genuinely nice
guy, funny and smart and generous—and Latino and immigrant (at four months of
age) and openly gay. Those last qualifiers guarantee that he’s spent a lot of
time in those side-niche poetry communities I mentioned earlier where there’s
much more community and cooperation.
Before the inauguration even took place, there were
rumblings from certain corners of po-biz about his selection. Award-winner or
not, Richard is not one of the usual recipients of this kind of honor. These kinds
of things, like the poet-laureate position of the U.S., are usually reserved
for a handful of old white guys who went to the “right” schools and studied with
the “right” teachers, etc., etc. So obviously, even though he had great
credentials, he couldn’t possibly be good enough for this job. He didn’t fit
the mold.
I read these carpings with little worry. I knew the quality
of Richard’s work, and I knew he would write and read a great poem. When the
inauguration came, he read with great effect a wonderful poem, in which he did
the almost impossible and caught the essence of America on the page. He brought
tears to the eyes of many Americans with his great poem, which caught perfectly
the mood of the moment that, even after terrible things have happened, we will
all pull together and make our country great.
Bare minutes after he finished reading, the insults and
criticizing began on Facebook and soon moved to prestigious blogs. His poem was
trashed, his performance was trashed, and sometimes he himself was trashed. I
came face to face with a very strong expression of the ugly side of po-biz. One
academic poet even admitted at the beginning of his attack, “I wanted to hate
[the poem.]” He ended with a suggestion that Richard should have inserted some exciting
profanity to liven up the poem and make it a little bit hip (completely
ignoring the occasion for which the poem was written at which “exciting
profanity” would have been totally inappropriate, if very hip).

So this past week I’ve been living more in the poetry world
than the mystery (and other commercial novel) world. I wrote a blog lamenting
the situation and the way poets tend to eat their own at the slightest excuse
and how the egos of poets are so often poetry’s worst enemies.


I’ve had a lot of support for this from poets of the
side-niche, collaborative communities of poetry—and even from some of the
po-biz folks themselves. But I’m ready to quit reading every attack and frothing
at the mouth at the absolute stupidity and cupidity of the remarks.
I’m ready to return to the sane and generous community of
mystery novelists where few, if any, feel that someone else’s professional good
fortune is a threat and an attack on their own lives, where writers are more
likely to extend a hand in congratulations to someone else getting an award
rather than to sling mud at her or him. I’m eager to return to the place where kind
writers with major reputations often offer a hand to those just starting out or
having to start over.
And I’m here to tell my friends who are writers and readers
in this great community—you don’t realize how good we have it here. Just take a
look across the way at po-biz and thank your stars or guardian angels that you’re
novel writers and readers and not poets.

Guest blog Jeri Westerson

Hi, it’s Linda here. Please welcome my friend and gifted writer of historical mysteries, Jeri Westerson. Jeri’s newest “medieval noir” Crispin Guest novel, Blood Lance, has just been published, and Jeri’s going to talk to us about the really extreme research she does in order to write about her disgraced medieval knight.


She’s Armed
By Jeri Westerson
When it comes to research, I’m a hands-on kind of gal. So
when I had an opportunity to put on some fourteenth century-style armor and get
a sword fighting lesson, I was all over it.

I have worn armor before, and have even sat on a
warhorse, a 2,000 pound Percheron while wearing light armor. My latest medieval
mystery BLOOD LANCE features a lot of sword craft and jousting, and in order to
give it the authenticity it needed, I’ve been venturing throughout southern
California eliciting the help of chivalrous knights far and wide. And no one
knows chivalry more than Scott Farrell. 




I met Scott Farrell some years ago when we did a podcast
interview on his site Chivalry Today. But this hot August day, I met him in
person, along with his wife April, and Scott’s fellow instructor Kyle
Lazzarevich at Team Touche, a fencing club in San Diego, where they agreed to
fit me with armor so I can get the feel of it.
Scott is an historical sword fighting coach and an author
and historical interpreter on knights, medieval history, and chivalry.He got
interested in the Middle Ages in high school and later got the re-enactor bug,
and then started doing demonstrations for kids, which led him to think about connecting
the code of chivalry into everyday life and to his podcasts. 

Medieval armor was crafted to fit the particular knight. You
didn’t just buy it off the rack at ye olde Walmart. So Scott had to cheat a bit
to fit it around my middle-aged frame and cheat some more to be able to
position the helm where I could half-way see. All in all, it’s unwieldy as you
can imagine, and heavy what with not being used to it and all. In reality, a
full set of armor or full harness weighs anywhere between 60 and 100 pounds,
but with the weight distributed all over the body it’s not as bad as it sounds.
Knights had to be able to move, fight, mount the horse, dismount. Though
because of the noise of mail and clanking plate, it wasn’t exactly build for
stealth. As a matter of fact, I’m betting that it was pretty intimidating hearing
that clanking sound approach and being confronted with a man in armor with a
sword, mace, flail, war hammer, ax, pole axe…well. You get the picture.
It was wonderful just closing my eyes and feeling the weight
of it, the smell, the sense of it on me, and imagining I am Crispin, my
medieval protagonist and detective, who lost his knighthood years before these
stories began.

Wearing armor is one thing—and a marvelous thing at
that!—but what was it like to fight with a sword?
In college I took fencing and was pretty darned good at it.
But fencing is a completely different style than medieval broad sword fighting.
Fencing is about style. Though it was utilitarian there was more in the way of
competition and style points than fighting and hacking away at an opponent. And
though medieval broad swords were also used in competition in tournaments, the
tournament was more for preparing for actual battle. Technique was important to
keep you alive, but it was more about what worked rather than panache. After
all, a broad sword is essentially a chopping and slashing weapon. It was your
shield in defense as much as it was used as an offensive weapon.
I learned about medieval weapons
through books and research. And I have my own cache of weapons I like to
demonstrate when I make appearances at libraries and bookstores. But there is
nothing like a hands-on approach. It’s not something that you can find readily
just anywhere.
Scott gave me a lesson in some medieval long sword
techniques. Keeping the blade edge toward your opponent and keeping it close to
your body were good tips. The use of the thumb on the leading hand on the hilt
can help balance but it is up to the student to decide to leave it vulnerable
above the cross guard. When using the sword two-handed, the leading hand
controls the vertical tilt of the sword, while the bottom hand controls the
horizontal. Flashy Hollywood-style fighting might look good on the screen, but
it leaves you wide open for a good gash to the torso. And who wants that?

After real training, could I take on an armored opponent?
Well, let’s just say, I’d rather leave the swordplay to experts, like Crispin.

Jeri Westerson wanted to create her
own brand of medieval mystery, and combined the concept of medieval mystery
with hard-boiled detective fiction into what she calls “Medieval Noir.”
Hard-boiled detective Crispin Guest, is a disgraced knight turned PI, solving
crimes on the mean streets of fourteenth century London. The critically
acclaimed series began with VEIL OF LIES, which garnered nominations
from the Mystery Reader’s Journal Macavity Award for Best Historical Mystery
and the Private Eye Writers of America Shamus Award for Best First PI Novel,
the first medieval mystery to be so honored. Each of the next three novels in the series garnered award nominations and critical praise, as well.

 

Publisher’s Weekly said of the fifth
in the series BLOOD LANCE; “Clever twists and convincing period detail make
Westerson’s fifth 14th-century historical featuring disgraced knight Crispin
Guest one of her best.”
Kirkus Review said, “Guest’s fifth adventure
again provides a lively tale of historical interest smoothly combined with a
worthy mystery.”  The
Richmond Times-Dispatch said, “Written with a
keen knowledge of medieval history, ‘Blood Lance’ is another riveting tale of
honor and heroism, grounded in period detail, a wealth of action and the
continued development of her characters.”
Jeri looks forward to the sixth, SHADOW
OF THE ALCHEMIST
in the fall of 2013.

Jeri has done talks around the
country about the Middle Ages, demonstrating her cache of medieval weaponry.
She has been a featured guest on the radio talk show Writers on Writing with
host Barbara DeMarco-Barrett, and a guest lecturer at the Bowers Museum in
Santa Ana. Jeri is vice president for the
southern California chapter of Mystery Writers of America and is also vice
president of the Los Angeles chapter of Sisters in Crime, and co-chair for the
California Crime Writer’s Conference for June 2013. She is also a member of
Private Eye Writers of America and the Historical Novel Society. Jeri is
married to a commercial photographer, has a screenwriter son, and herds two
cats, a tortoise, and the occasional tarantula at her home in southern
California.
Visit Jeri’s blog www.Getting-Medieval.com for
articles on history and mystery as well as author interviews. Or see what
Crispin has to say on his very own blog. She is
also part of the group blog Poe’s Deadly Daughters
and you can follow her on Twitter
and see what Crispin is up to on his Facebook page.

 

 

Getting It Together


“Someday I’ll get it all together,”
my husband mutters morosely as he struggles with something that slipped through
the cracks in his ultra-busy life. I’ve done the same myself many times. We’re
all juggling so many plates that it’s no wonder when one of them crashes to the
floor or is rescued from that fate only by a quick diving grab.
About a year ago, however, I
promised myself that I’d stop using that term “getting it all together,”
because I know—we all do, actually—that no one ever gets it all
together. In fact, it’s just a nice camouflaged way of saying, “Someday I’ll be
perfect.” And we wouldn’t say that out loud anywhere anyone else could hear us,
would we?
Of course, we wouldn’t, but every
time we say, “I’m going to get it all together,” we are pushing ourselves into
that perfectionist role. I bring this up because it’s something with which I’ve
struggled all my life. I aim for competence, wanting to be the best I possibly
can, the top of the class, in all areas of my life. But none of us can be the
top of the class in everything.
Over the years, I’ve had to realize
that I’m never going to win the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval—certainly
not for my housekeeping! As I’ve become more involved in the world of writing
novels for trade houses who want at least one novel a year, I’ve just given up
on the house. And very early in my life, I came to grips with the fact that I
will never be a fashionably-dressed, perfectly-made-up, stylish woman. I make
up for these failings in many other areas. But like many of us, I suspect, I
judge myself against the best in each area of my life. Against the woman who’s
cold to her family and has no friends, I hold up not my loving family and
friends but my messy home against her spotless, department-store-window house.
Against the woman who’s superficial and shallow, I hold up not my lifetime
pursuit of learning or my passionate concern with issues but my bare face and
comfortable shoes against her fashionista appearance.
I know I’m not the only one who does
this comparison of someone else’s strong point against my weak point. I suspect
it’s actually pretty common. But I’ve decided that I’m no longer going to do
this to myself—and part of overcoming it is discarding the concept of “getting
it all together.” Even those who seem on the surface to have it all together,
don’t. We’ve seen that again and again—the wealthy, famous, beautiful people
who seem on top of everything yet go plunging down the slopes, the woman (or
man) we always admired because she seemed to have everything in her life under
such good control, only to find she was flailing every day behind her
impeccable façade. Yet still, we put this burden of “getting it all together”
on our shoulders—and wonder why we walk slumped over.
So here and now, I’ll admit that I
don’t have it all together, nor am I probably ever going to have it all
together. I have too many areas where I’m simply not really together at all or only
partly together, on Wednesdays and Sundays. But I do have a few areas of
strength where I’m really at the top of my game—and I think those are where I’m
going to focus my energy now instead of trying to become the fashionista or
uber-hausfrau that I’m not. So, look out, world. Hear me roar! Just don’t look
at the shoes, please.

Great Expectations


Contests and awards are wonderful.
Americans love them and love winners, above all, from the Olympics to the
Pulitzer to The Voice. We love a winner, and that’s what we all want to be, a
winner.
What happens when we come close?
What happens when we’re so good that we beat out hundreds of others to become
one of a handful of finalists, but we don’t win? I’ve been there a number of times
in my writing career, most notably when I was a finalist for a prestigious national
poetry award with a nice cash award that you had to be nominated for. I really
hoped I would win it, but that was not to be. Bummer! When I checked out the
work of the winner, however, I could see that, if that was the work that spoke
to that judge, there had never really been a chance for mine to win. It was
great poetry, but a very different type of poetry from mine.
I’m thinking about this today because
a dear writing-group friend of mine made it to the finals of a big national
award in two different genres, novella and essay. What an accomplishment! Our
whole writing group, which is tiny, celebrated with her and rooted for her to
win. She just received word that she hadn’t won in either category and is
crestfallen and depressed.
I’ve been on just about all the
sides of this issue. Not only have I been a finalist who’s not made it to
winner status (many times), I’ve been a winner (several times). I’ve also been
a screening judge (the ones who read through hundreds of manuscripts to send on
one or more finalists) and a final judge in these contests. And I’m telling my
friend—and you readers out there—that the real accomplishment is in making the
finals. The competition out there is fierce. Out of those hundreds of
manuscripts the screening judge must choose one (sometimes with a back-up of
another or two) to go on to the finals. I’ve seen many times that I wished I
could send more, but it wasn’t possible. So, every one of the finalists is
basically a winner. Each manuscript is usually worthy of winning the award in
its own right, but the final judge is only allowed to choose one. I’ve seen
judges really agonize and beg to name two winners or even three, because the
works are all of such high quality. In each case, they’re sent back to choose a
single one. It’s practically a coin toss at that point.
My message to my friend and to
everyone who reads this who eventually winds up as a finalist for something is
this. Making the finals is the real victory. Believe this! Know it deep inside.
That way, if you don’t win that last coin toss, you won’t despair. And if you
do win, you won’t get a big head and start to think you’re better than everyone
else. You’ll know that there are four to nine others who could be in your place
if the coin had just fallen slightly differently. Either way, you’re a winner.
Congratulations!

Writing Books and Maintaining Friendships

by Linda
Rodriguez
I have become a terrible friend. I
spend all my time writing books, taking care of the business of books
(research, tours, conferences, accounting, and correspondence with editors, agents,
publicists, and fans), and promoting my books (blogs, guest blogs, interviews,
signings and readings, Facebook, Twitter, email newsletters, etc.). There’s
little time left over even for my family and my own physical and spiritual needs.
Making time for a friend involves
carving a hunk out of an already over-committed day, and the problem is that I
have a lot of friends. They’re wonderful people with whom I love to spend a
leisurely lunch or afternoon coffee/tea break while engaged in delightful,
intelligent conversation. I’m lucky if I can manage this with one of them every
few months. So I have many friends I only “see” on Facebook. This is one thing
with friends I love who live far away. Facebook is a great way to keep in touch
with them when we know we’ll only see each other once a year at some
conference. It’s quite another kettle of fish with friends who live in the same
town.
I’ve been thinking about this
situation lately—and my thoughts have not been happy ones. I miss my friends,
and I hate responding to an invitation to get together with a list of three possible
dates four months in the future. I worry that the message that sends is not at
all the one I want to send, that they will incorrectly feel I don’t value their
friendships. As for a spontaneous “Mary’s in town for two days, so let’s have
lunch with her and catch up,” I’m almost never in a position to join in.
This situation all came to a head
for me recently. A friend sent me a chain email that talked about a sister who
would never spontaneously go to lunch and had recently died without ever going
to lunch with her sister. (I wonder why they chose to send that email to me?)
Right after that, I received an email from one of my oldest friends to tell me
she’d had surgery and was laid up at home in bed, going stir-crazy. My first
thought was, “I should drive out there and visit with her.” This friend lives
on the other side of town out in the country, entailing an hour-long highway drive
there and and another hour-long highway drive back. That visit would eat up an entire afternoon, so my first
thought was immediately followed by a list of the things I have to do, many of
which have imminent deadlines. “I’ll send her a card and some flowers to wish
her a quick recovery and finish some of these urgent tasks,” was my next
thought. “I’ll visit her later when I have time.” As if I would ever have an
open afternoon to go see her without creating it!
That quick dismissal of my friend’s
situation in order to get back to the always-present workload left me wondering
what was wrong with me? When had I become the kind of person who would begrudge
a few hours to visit a friend at home alone on bed rest? If a wonderful
professional opportunity suddenly presented itself, and I needed to make major
adjustments to my schedule to accommodate it, I knew I would. Why not for an
old, dear friend?
I sat down and made a list of all
the good friends I’ve had to put off for lunch or other meetings. I decided I
had to do something about this. I’m trying to build a whole new career with my
books, and it’s demanding and time-consuming, as it is for any small
businessperson. But I don’t want to ignore my friends. So I made up a schedule
that allows me to meet someone for lunch every week. I’m going to work my
way through my list of friends that way. It means finding some other time to do
some critical tasks. They’re also important and can’t be skipped. It won’t
be easy, at all. But I know the kind of person I am, the kind of person I long
ago decided to be, a person to whom people are more important than things. If
my career takes a little longer to get going, at least I won’t have achieved it
at the cost of becoming someone different from who I truly am.
And yes, dear reader, I’ll be slow
responding to your comments today because I’m spending the afternoon taking
lunch to my dear friend who’s recuperating from surgery, and we’ll be making
bad jokes and laughing hysterically at them.

Guest Thursday–Kathleen George

Hi, everyone! This is Linda, and I’m pleased to welcome Kathleen George as a guest to The Stiletto Gang. Kathleen has been writing wonderful, smart police procedurals set in her hometown of Pittsburgh for years. The Odds was nominated for an Edgar. Her new book, Simple, will launch Aug. 21. I think it’s her best yet.
Nora the Teacher
by Kathleen George
I knew the writer Nora Ephron just a little through
my husband who’s been friends with her husband for many years.  The four of us had a few lunches and dinners
together.  Most of this social contact was,
I believe, before she became ill.  Or before
she knew she was.  I found her
intimidating and fantastic at the same time. 
Once she ordered a diet Coke and the waiter told her soberly that the
Coke dispenser in the restaurant (a nice restaurant) was broken.  She gave him a withering gaze.  She said, “There’s a store next door!”  He mumbled and dithered.  She got up from the table and returned
minutes later with a huge bottle of diet Coke. 
“We’ll need glasses of ice,” she informed him as he got an aha expression
on his face.
Her wit never took a holiday.  She was brightly brittle and funny about
politics, the movie business, food, everything. 
To me, her lines always have the mark of a surprising truth.  “Just the burger, no French fries,” she told a
different waiter at a different lunch.  Then
she called him back and said levelly, “I’ll have the French fries with my
burger.”  She turned to us.  “Is there such a thing as a bad French fry?”
She said at a lunch on another day, as we tried to
avoid the thick gorgeous bread on the table—and failed miserably—that if she
found she had a month to live, she would eat nothing but bread.  I wonder if she did.  We had lost touch by then but she was
protecting her privacy, not talking about her illness.  I hope she had lots of great bread during
those last years.
Food was one of her great subjects but so was
politics and the news.  After 9/11 she recounted
stories about people who said things like, “I was at the dentist and he knew a woman who . . . “ etc.  She was contemptuous about people who tried
to make that huge tragic disaster about them. 
And she was right; she was a walking cautionary lecture. 
I read an interview with her in which she said
criticism never stopped her.  She didn’t
take the time to let it bother her.  It
was always important, she said, to be on the next project, working and not
looking back.  And apparently she was working up to the last minute.
In that interview she also said that her image of a
good death was to die in her sleep at 83. 
She didn’t make it to 83.  She got
cheated big time by twelve years and I doubt that she had peaceful sleep at the
end.  But once more she was teaching.  By socializing and working up to the end—and
not talking about illness and impending death—it seems she gave us that
possibility to ponder.  “Nobody knew,”
her husband said.  What a big decision
that was.
I’m still thinking about Nora’s way.  But I’ve always ended up thinking hard about
all her lessons.   










KATHLEEN GEORGE is the author of The Odds, which was nominated in 2010
for the Edgar for Best Novel. Her new novel, Simple (Minotaur Books), will launch on August 21. She is also the editor
of the short story collection Pittsburgh
Noir
. A professor of theatre at the University of Pittsburgh, she and her
husband live in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Time Management for Writers

by  Linda Rodriquez

In my former life, I ran a very
successful university women’s center. I was famous for my time management and
organizational skills—and not just on campus. I was fairly well-known in Kansas
City because of the many public programs I organized and led and the numerous
organizations with which I collaborated and partnered. People often remarked
that they couldn’t understand how I could keep track of so many events and
activities and accomplish so many things.

I was extremely organized,
and my family and I lived and died by my DayTimer. That was part of the answer,
but the other, hidden part was the number of nights I stayed up until 3:00
a.m., finishing some project before getting up again at 5:30 a.m. to put myself
together and attend an early breakfast event or meeting to start my workday of
10-12 hours. Eventually, when I developed several serious autoimmune disorders
I could no longer keep up that kind of schedule.
Now, I write for a living. Writing
is my job, as running the women’s center once was. But I seem to have lost all
those fabulous time management and organizational skills. Not only do we no
longer live and die by my DayTimer in this family, I’d be hard put to lay my
hands on it. After several years of serious and scary debility before doctors
diagnosed and found proper treatment for me, my house has never been the same,
smooth-running, well-organized place it once was. Some things I regularly did
to keep it humming along I can simply no longer physically accomplish.
My biggest problem in the time
management area is managing to balance the writing of books with all the online
and in-person promotion of books that is required of us today. If I overdo
building the “platform” my publisher would like to see, my writing time
suffers, but if I don’t do enough of the promotion, my sales suffer. I don’t
have an answer, but I’ve learned to make writing the first thing I do in my
work hours. Once I ensure that my current book-in-progress is going well, I can
schedule in promotion activities for the rest of my time. When I follow that
simple principle, I feel that my writing life is in balance. When I get
sidetracked and don’t, I begin to feel out of whack and overwhelmed.
What are your tips? How do you
manage your writing and promotion time? How do you organize your life to keep
that balance? Or don’t you?

A Bonded Pair

From the cat who literally
swallowed the canary (and then threw it up on your aunt’s antique Persian rug)
to the dog who ran away, we at the Stiletto Gang put our collective heads
together and thought: what could be better than walking down memory lane with
thoughts of some of our favorite–and not-so-favorite–pets? Join us for the
next two weeks as we reminisce about the animals we loved and those who loved
us.

Tragedy brought me Bonnie, a
13-year-old cat who was as tiny as a kitten, first. Her owner was my
almost-brother. Steve was my little brother’s best friend. They’d lived with my
husband and me briefly, and when they moved out, they rented a house just a few
blocks away and continued to eat supper at our house every night. Once my
brother married and moved out of town, Steve kept coming to our house for
holidays or any time he needed family support. Steve was a shy geek with a warm
heart. One day, someone tied a litter of five kittens in a plastic bag and
dumped them in the middle of the street to be run over. Steve found them, took
them to the vet, and spayed and neutered them. Thirteen years later early on a Sunday
morning, Steve was killed by a hit-and-run driver, leaving five old cats in his
house waiting for him to come home.

His friends gathered and parceled
out the cats among us. I already had two elderly cats and a young one, all
rescues, at home, but when no one would step forward for Bonnie, the runt of
the litter, I took her. Within a week, several of the littermates turned out to
have liver cancer and had to be put to sleep. Over the course of the next year,
this happened to all of them, except tiny Bonnie.
From the first, Bonnie hid. One of
her favorite places was behind the refrigerator. She had a bell on her collar,
and once the lights were out and we were in bed, we would hear her venturing
forth. It took me so long to get her to venture forth voluntarily and sit on my
lap to be petted, but once there, she decided that was where she always wanted
to be. If I were doing some chore around the house and not paying attention to
her, she would wind around my legs, scolding me.

Shortly after we took Bonnie into
our home, we ended up rescuing a beautiful seven-year-old Shar Pei/Husky mix.
We took Mina on what would have been the last day of her life otherwise. When
we brought her into our house, all the cats fled, except Bonnie. I was set to
try to gradually introduce them to each other when Bonnie walked straight up to
Mina, who was giant in comparison, and touched noses. From that second, they
were the best of friends, never apart.
Bonnie was the dominant member of
the pair, though. She would go nibble a few pieces of Mina’s dog kibble, and
Mina was then allowed to eat some of Bonnie’s food. They made a point to drink
out of each other’s water bowls also. At night, Mina would curl into a circle,
and Bonnie would curl up within its center. Mina showed affection by licking
Bonnie as if she were a puppy, and Bonnie tolerated it. Mina would bark at
suspicious noises at night, and Bonnie would stand behind her, mimicking her
stiff-legged posture and give the best imitations of a bark you ever heard from
a cat.
Then, Bonnie started eating less and
having bouts of loud crying that could only be assuaged by my holding her and
petting or by Mina licking her. When I took her to the vet, the word was that
the deadly liver cancer had finally hit this last living member of that
five-cat litter. We think she held the cancer at bay for those almost four
years by sheer strength of personality. She was finally somewhere where she
wasn’t the bullied runt—and we’d even found her a giant pet! She wasn’t about
to die when things were finally going so well for her.
Unfortunately, there wasn’t much to
be done. As she got sicker, she cried more. Until Mina would wash Bonnie with
her big tongue, leaving her looking like a little drowned rat. But she was
always at peace and purring when Mina licked her or I held her. The vet said we’d
know when to bring her in one last time, and that point became clear one day.
We packed her carry-crate with lots of blankets and soft fabric because she was
so bony by then. Mina was licking her one last time. At the vet’s, Bonnie lay
in my lap, purring, as she slipped away peacefully.
Mina was disconsolate for months and
then rallied to remain our wonderful friend for five more years before she left
us the same way. We laugh when we think of the surprise and joy those two friends
must have felt when their spirits encountered each other again. It’s a comfort
to think of them curled around each other at night as they were for so many
nights in our house—a true bonded pair.

by Linda Rodriguez

___________
Linda Rodriguez’s novel, Every Last Secret (Minotaur Books), won
the Malice Domestic Best First Traditional Mystery Novel Competition. The
second book in the Skeet Bannion series, Every
Broken Trust
, will be published in spring of 2013. Linda reads and writes
everything, even award-winning books of poetry and a cookbook, and she spends
too much time on Twitter as @rodriguez_linda. 
She blogs about writers, writing, and the absurdities of everyday life
at http://lindarodriguezwrites.blogspot.com.

Pitching the Great Books

I’d like everyone to welcome the fabulous and talented Linda Rodriguez! She is not only an amazing friend, but one heck of a writer. If you don’t believe me, her novel Every Last Secret is out TODAY! Trust me, you’ll want to check it out. In the meantime, Linda has an excellent challenge for all of us today! Take it away, Linda…

Recently, I served as a judge on a panel billed as “American Idol for book pitches—without the Simon Cowell.” Four of us judges listened to twenty-five aspiring authors give one-minute pitches for their books as if we were editors or agents they’d met at a conference. We then gave the authors feedback designed to help them improve their book pitches, and the author we decided had the best pitch was later connected with an appropriate agent and editor in the book’s specific field.

This event was so entertaining and educational that people paid just to come in and watch it without participating. It gave me a new appreciation of the power of a good book pitch. I wrote a blog post about the event, and a commenter lamented what book pitching would have done to Melville’s Moby Dick. This left me wondering how some books I’ve read would be pitched in today’s competitive market. See if you can guess the author or title of the books being pitched below. Then, in the comments, try pitching some book you’ve loved.

Book 1

In this great noir novel, Ethan’s secret love for his wife’s sweet cousin and nursemaid, Mattie, grows daily as his wife becomes more ill-tempered and demanding. He struggles with his desire and his conscience. When his wife decides to send Mattie away, Ethan can no longer bear it. He tries to run away with her and fails, so Mattie suggests a suicide pact. Ethan agrees, but at the last minute, will he be able to carry this off, or will his weakness cause him to fail yet again and pay a grim price the rest of his life?

Book 2

Mystery upon mystery fills this novel, and it ends with one of the most suspenseful chases in literature. A great lady has a great secret, but Tulkinghorn, her wealthy husband’s lawyer, ferrets it out with the intention of blackmailing Mrs. D. to do his bidding. Tulkinghorn has other plots, as well, forcing a retired soldier, George, to tarnish his honor and ruining him anyway, using a discarded French lady’s maid as a cat’s-paw with a promise of a job and threatening her with deportation when she calls in his promise. In the midst of all these crimes and plots, a police detective, Bucket, keeps an eye on the main players, especially Tulkinghorn. When Tulkinghorn is murdered and George arrested for it, Bucket searches for the true murderer all the way into Mrs. D’s boudoir. But even if Bucket finds the killer, can he keep a greater tragedy from occurring?

Book 3

A poor but beautiful girl is violently raped by a wealthy man and left pregnant. After her newborn dies, she tries to start a new life where her sordid history is not known. She falls in love and marries, only to be deserted by her husband when he learns of her past. With her father’s death, she and her family become destitute and homeless. Finally, she is forced to become her rapist’s mistress, only to murder him when her husband returns to find her. Her landlady sees the blood seeping through the ceiling and calls the police. Will our heroine escape to freedom with the love of her life or be caught and executed for the murder of a brutal aristocrat?

Answers: Ethan Frome, Edith Wharton; Bleak House, Charles Dickens; Tess of the D’Urbervilles, Thomas Hardy

Linda Rodriguez, author of Every Last Secret, blogs about books and writers at www.LindaRodriguezWrites.blogspot.com. She reads and writes everything, even poetry, and she spends too much time on Twitter as @rodriguez_linda.