Presidential Campaign Fatigue
can’t come soon enough, in my opinion.
Already, I have Presidential Campaign Fatigue—PCF in medical
parlance—which means that I break into a cold sweat when I see a black and
white photo of candidate X—be it the incumbent or his opponent—superimposed
over a red background with a sonorous voice telling us how the candidate once
approved the mass slaughter of a litter of kittens, all the while forcing us to
buy health insurance, making billions of dollars, or cutting jobs at a rate
consistent with the mating habits of common garden rodents.
the other Presidential candidates, anything that ranges from misidentifying the
state bird of North Dakota to telling it like it is—as it was reported in the
host country’s own tabs—when it comes to security at the Olympic Village. The gaffes may be of a political nature but I
do know that most are inconsequential to the state of the Union. The wives of the candidates are no exception;
one gets slammed for wearing a gorgeous—albeit expensive—jacket on an overseas
jaunt while the other makes the mistake of saying “you people” when referring
to, well, you people. (Personally, I think “you people” is a legitimate catchall but that may because I spend 50 hours alone every week in an attic.) It makes me wonder
why anyone in their right mind would want to run for office, never mind allow
their spouse to do so.
want civility in politics and 87% believe we can actually achieve that
goal! Another 85% of Americans would
love—LOVE!—it if their leaders could form friendships across the aisle. Seriously, how are we supposed to get along
in a global economy and world if we can’t even stomach the guy sitting across
from us, the guy we need to reach consensus with in order to legislate
effectively? In doing research for this
post, I now know that there are entire sites devoted to civility in politics
but I guess the people who really need to look at these sites—our politicians—aren’t
reading them or heeding their measured words.
past, would the idea of an informed decision take root? In other words, if we really knew what
candidates stood for, without all of the noise and incivility, would we be able
to make a decision that reflected what we actually knew and cared about in
terms of each candidate? Because right
now, here’s what I have been told about both candidates and their wives:
One is a socialist who wants to steal from the
rich and give to the poor.
The other stole billions of dollars while
working as a businessman and doesn’t think that rich people should pay taxes at
all. Oh, and he strapped his Irish setter to the top of his car and drove to
Canada.
If you don’t have anyone to blame in an argument,
you can go with either George W. Bush or Bill Clinton.
One’s wife is a wealthy woman who likes to ride
horses and is against all working moms.
The other’s wife shops at Banana Republic
sometimes but most of the time spends American’s hard-earned dollars on
clothes.
every statement listed above but do any of them really tell the entire story of
the person, their beliefs, their habits, or their ability to govern?
a lot of television. And then I read
some more. I happen to be working on a
book right now that deals with the American political landscape which is
fascinating because its “just the facts, ma’am” approach reminds me that the
bedrock of our political system is solid and based on sound principles of
philosophy specifically generated during the Age of Enlightenment. Based on what we hear and see these days,
you’d think that the guy who wrote FIGHT CLUB had drafted the campaign
strategies of both candidates.
campaign and make an informed decision come voting time? Or is your mind already made up?